tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309330477814660592.post5344005822179648771..comments2022-09-07T05:28:25.514-07:00Comments on Climate Observer: Dr. Roy Spencer's Global Warming For DummiesClimate Observerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06305141195861809441noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309330477814660592.post-37011213599346962812010-07-27T03:33:53.727-07:002010-07-27T03:33:53.727-07:00Peter I would also like to address your comment th...Peter I would also like to address your comment that "CO2 and global temperature rise are almost in complete tandem going back the last 3 million years." I'm not sure where you have got that sort of information from, as they certainly don't look that way according to this well known graph: (http://biocab.org/Carbon_Dioxide_Geological.jpg) and there is also little correlation between CO@ and temperature in the most modern versions either:<br />(http://icecap.us/images/uploads/tc02vsIPCC.jpg)Climate Observerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06305141195861809441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309330477814660592.post-61947889081706107482010-07-26T05:57:04.607-07:002010-07-26T05:57:04.607-07:00Peter thank you for your input.
In your post yo...Peter thank you for your input. <br /><br />In your post you mentioned NOAA as one source of refutation and no doubt you would be aware of their recent claim to 2010 having warmest Global Temperatures for June, April to June, and Year-to-Date on Record. Yet when applied to a critical eye there are several holes that quickly appear in NOAA's analysis. A quick check finds this critique that may interest you: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/17/noaas-jan-jun-2010-warmest-ever-missing-data-false-impressions/ <br /><br />As for the NAS they were heavily involved in that rather embarrassing "Blacklist" paper (http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/06/27/sepp-on-the-pnas-blacklist-paper/ ) just recently that did little to enhance their and the authors credibility. With many notable climate alarmists distancing themselves as a result. <br /><br />It is worth considering that these organisations on which you are relying are at times the ones giving out their own targeted misinformation for a variety of reasons.Climate Observerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06305141195861809441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8309330477814660592.post-49757015602556782042010-07-26T04:06:21.788-07:002010-07-26T04:06:21.788-07:00Most of the information submitted above is sadly m...Most of the information submitted above is sadly misinformation-<br /><br />it can easily be refuted by the NOAA, The National Academy of Sciences and others.<br /><br />CO2 and global temperature rise are almost in complete tandem going back the last 3 million years.sleepershiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18164040606411038826noreply@blogger.com